Trump's recent executive orders removing regulatory barriers for AI development aren't just about global competition—they're about unleashing American innovation that's been trapped under decades-old compliance frameworks.
The AI Action Summit's focus on removing barriers for American companies to "truly innovate and lead globally" hits directly at a problem we know well: outdated regulations are killing startups while entrenched players thrive.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act, enacted in the 1970s, was designed to solve real problems: inaccurate reports, lack of transparency, and consumer protection from credit bureaus.
But fifty years later, it's created something worse—an environment where only legacy players with compliance armies can thrive.
Consider the ambiguity: What constitutes a "consumer report" when AI analyzes public social media data? Can innovative screening solutions operate without triggering burdensome adverse action requirements that make employers avoid background screening entirely?
These aren't theoretical questions. Regulatory uncertainty is forcing innovation offshore while American startups burn cash on legal fees instead of R&D.
Here's where the media narrative breaks down completely.
If you trained AI on 10,000 expert diagnosticians to help identify difficult medical conditions, wouldn't common sense tell you that system would outperform your general practitioner who sees you twice a year?
AI trained on objective behavioral patterns from thousands of successful employment outcomes will inevitably be more consistent and fair than individual hiring managers operating on gut instinct, personal preferences, and unconscious bias.
Yet we're seeing lawsuits like the Workday case treating AI resume evaluation as inherently more biased than human judgment—a position that defies both logic and evidence.
When regulatory barriers fall, AI can finally deliver on FCRA's original promise better than bureaucratic processes ever could:
The current system protects nobody except incumbent players and compliance attorneys.
American AI companies are ready to lead—if we're allowed to compete.
Modern screening technology can identify genuine values alignment and professional fit while eliminating human bias. But only if we can build without 1970s regulatory handcuffs designed for credit bureaus, not AI innovation.
The question isn't whether AI will transform hiring—it's whether American companies will be allowed to lead that transformation.