Restricted decision view
Configure the process so reviewers do not receive unnecessary protected or irrelevant detail simply because it appears in a public source.
UK financial services · Public-content screening
Proportionate social-media screening for defined risk—not blanket monitoring
Review relevant publicly available content for defined roles or trigger events—with human verification, protected-data controls and an evidence trail for your decision.
Request a workflow reviewReview the workflow
Screening should be necessary for an identified risk, transparent, fair and proportionate. See the ICO’s current draft vetting guidance.
Illustrative report preview: evidence, context and controls—not a black-box score
A reviewer should be able to understand what was found, where it came from, what was withheld and what judgement still belongs to the firm.
- Relevant public source, date and surrounding context
- Applied review criterion and reviewer note
- Recorded withholding of protected or irrelevant information
- Clear separation between evidence and the firm’s decision
This illustrative preview supports the workflow-review offer; it does not promise a downloadable sample report.
A scoped review from policy question to evidence record
- Define: Document the role, trigger, review criteria and retention period.
- Match: Resolve public profiles carefully.
- Review: Apply the defined criteria while retaining source context and date.
- Restrict: Limit protected or irrelevant information reaching the decision view.
- Decide: The authorised people in the firm use human judgement and record their rationale.
Design the review to minimise irrelevant exposure
Documented criteria
Define conduct and role criteria before review and preserve why a finding reached the report.
Context and correction
Keep source context available and give the person an appropriate way to explain, challenge or correct material information.
Controlled retention
Retain report and evidence only for a documented period aligned to policy, legal obligations and the purpose of assessment.
Social-media screening in UK financial services
Does the FCA require social-media screening?
No. The FCA explicitly says firms do not need to monitor employees’ private lives or social media.
Does this workflow access private accounts?
The proposed workflow is limited to publicly available content and does not ask for passwords or private account access.
Does the report make an employment or fitness-and-propriety decision?
No. The authorised decision-maker remains responsible for assessing relevance, fairness and outcome.